{"id":630,"date":"2010-03-10T06:35:49","date_gmt":"2010-03-10T14:35:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2010\/03\/10\/creating-collaboration\/"},"modified":"2010-03-09T18:41:54","modified_gmt":"2010-03-10T02:41:54","slug":"creating-collaboration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2010\/03\/10\/creating-collaboration\/","title":{"rendered":"Creating collaboration"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"group\" by<\/em> Arenamontanus<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

How John Chambers Learned to Collaborate at Cisco<\/a>
\n[Via HarvardBusiness.org<\/a>]<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In 2001, as the dot.com boom turned to bust, CEO John Chambers of Cisco<\/a> saw a massive $460 billion of Cisco’s overall stock market value evaporate before his eyes. Game over? Not really. At that moment, Chambers started a reinvention of the company \u2014 from a “cowboy” mentality where people worked in silos to a collaborative approach. It has paid off so far. Revenues are up 90% since 2002, while profit margins are up to 20.8% from 16.3%. And Chambers earned the #4 spot on our best-performing CEO ranking, published last month by Harvard Business Review<\/a>. Not bad.<\/p>\n

Chambers created the following 5 pillars to drive collaboration, an approach we can all learn from. These amount to what I call disciplined collaboration in my book Collaboration<\/a><\/em>: focus on business value, tear down barriers, and create a new organization architecture. (Full disclosure: last autumn I met with the top 50 leadership team at Cisco to discuss collaboration; the information here is all from public sources, however).<\/p>\n

[More<\/a>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The five pillars are these:<\/em><\/p>\n

1. Change leadership style.<\/em><\/p>\n

2. Change incentives.<\/em><\/p>\n

3. Change the structure.<\/em><\/p>\n

4. Change how you work.<\/em><\/p>\n

5. Use new social media tools.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

These are all hallmarks of systems thinking. No more top-down thinking. Make people want to collaborate. The structure needs to map human social networks. Bring multiple points of view to examine the problem.<\/em><\/p>\n

But it also uses things like constraints and goals to keep on track. It uses diffused leadership rather than central but makes sure there are ways to give the successful groups their rewards.<\/em><\/p>\n

It also includes selecting for people who want this sort of structure. Luckily, the ones who thrive here are exactly the types who will produce success.<\/em><\/p>\n

Read about the development of the Mac<\/a> to get an idea of what these people are like. And also see what happened when a typical hierarchical manager was put in charge<\/a>. Order and proper respect for authority was more important than success.<\/em><\/p>\n

Apple made a mistake by putting these people into a silo type of management structure<\/a> after the Mac came out. Many of the developers of the Mac were gone in less than 18 months<\/a>, including the founder of the company, Steve Jobs.<\/em><\/p>\n

The structure that Cisco built for collaboration can produce wonderful things. But its requirements need to be understood and supported by management in order to succeed.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Arenamontanus How John Chambers Learned to Collaborate at Cisco [Via HarvardBusiness.org] In 2001, as the dot.com boom turned to bust, CEO John Chambers of Cisco saw a massive $460 billion of Cisco’s overall stock market value evaporate before his eyes. Game over? Not really. At that moment, Chambers started a reinvention of the company … Continue reading Creating collaboration<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[10,4],"tags":[14,34,15,33],"class_list":["post-630","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-knowledge-creation","category-web-20","tag-economy","tag-knowledge-creation","tag-sustainability","tag-web-20"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pe2yp-aa","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":69,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/03\/21\/working-transparently\/","url_meta":{"origin":630,"position":0},"title":"Working Transparently","date":"March 21, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by jurvetson Working Transparently: [Via Gurteen Knowledge-Log] By David Gurteen I am including almost all of the post bt David Gurteen for a reason. It brings together in one post the ideas espoused by several other people. So, I quote David, who quotes John who quotes Michael. Every step in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Knowledge Creation"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/06\/03\/online-water-coolers\/","url_meta":{"origin":630,"position":1},"title":"Online Water Coolers","date":"June 3, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by aussiegall What\u2019s Your Internal Social Networking Strategy?: [Via Enterprise 2.0 Blog] Nemertes recently noted that eighty-three percent of organizations are now \"virtual\" meaning that members of workgroups reside in physically separate locations. The emergence of the virtual workplace has radically changed not only how we communicate and collaborate, but\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Knowledge Creation"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/06\/gerbera-jpg.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":65,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/03\/19\/more-examples-of-tacit-to-explicit-transformations\/","url_meta":{"origin":630,"position":2},"title":"More examples of tacit to explicit transformations","date":"March 19, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by tanakawho KM 2.0 is about \u201cshowing your workings out\u201d: [Via Library clips] Two of my posts have linked and quoted blog posts that are bringing to light the difference that the renewed push in KM brings, in a shift to a \u201cwork in progress\u201d mentality. I have mentioned several\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Knowledge Creation"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/03\/dragonfly-wings.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":93,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/04\/07\/public-collaboration\/","url_meta":{"origin":630,"position":3},"title":"Public collaboration","date":"April 7, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Clearly Ambiguous Work-in-Progress Culture: [Via Transparent Office] Michael Idinopulos makes a great observation - Web 2.0 is collaboration in public. Fewer closed doors and more open hallways. The real paradigm shift in Web 2.0, I believe, is the blurring the line between publication and collaboration. In the old days,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Knowledge Creation"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":681,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2010\/10\/07\/the-conversation-i-moderated\/","url_meta":{"origin":630,"position":4},"title":"The conversation I moderated","date":"October 7, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Seattle Channel Video can be played in Flash Player 9 and up On September 14, I moderated a discussion between Ash Awad, Vice President of Energy & Facility Services at McKinstry; and Daniel Friedman, Dean of the College of Built Environments at the University of Washington. The topic was A\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Knowledge Creation"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":188,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/05\/20\/social-media-sites-for-scientists\/","url_meta":{"origin":630,"position":5},"title":"Social media sites for scientists","date":"May 20, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"myScience: \u201csocial software\u201d for scientists: [Via O'Really? at Duncan.Hull.name] With apologies to Jonathan Swift: \u201cGreat sites have little sites upon their back to bite \u2018em And little sites have lesser sites, and so ad infinitum\u2026\u201d So what happened was, Carole Goble asked on the myExperiment mailing list, \u201cis there a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Knowledge Creation"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/farm1.static.flickr.com\/192\/512341455_0493eeb389_m.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/630"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=630"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/630\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=630"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=630"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=630"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}