{"id":337,"date":"2008-08-21T07:59:11","date_gmt":"2008-08-21T14:59:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/?p=337"},"modified":"2008-08-21T18:07:56","modified_gmt":"2008-08-22T01:07:56","slug":"royalties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/08\/21\/royalties\/","title":{"rendered":"Royalties"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"ribosome\" by <\/em><\/span>Vik Nanda<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/span>
\nRoyalties for journal article authors<\/a>:
\n[Via Bench Marks<\/a>]<\/p>\n

I’m happy to say that this week we sent out our first round of royalty payments to authors of original articles in CSH Protocols<\/a><\/em>. Because we’re doing some reprinting of material from our already-published laboratory manuals, we built in a system to pay royalties to the editors of those manuals. We chose at the time to extend those royalties to authors of new material as well. The idea of writing up methods isn’t something that immediately occurs to most laboratories–they’re usually more interested in publishing data, so we’re hoping that these royalty payments will at least serve as something of a motivation for publishing (and continuing to publish) protocols with us. We’re not talking about huge sums of money, but as I recall from my graduate student days, every little bit helps. It also addresses one of the complaints one hears about us greedy science publishers–that we fail to compensate scientists for the work they’ve put into the publication and keep all the cash for ourselves. While CSHL Press<\/a> is part of a not-for-profit research institute, and any money we make from our publications goes to fund research at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory<\/a>, we’re very curious to see what happens from this experiment in revenue-sharing. Does this make a difference to you as an author?<\/p>\n

This set of royalties covers the calendar year 2007. A portion of our subscription revenue is set aside and divided among all authors\/editors based on the usage of their individual articles during that calendar year. Those who published articles late in the year may not see much in terms of revenue given the relatively small time scale that their articles were available, but hopefully their articles will see a little more use in 2008.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This is a really interesting experiment. Many researchers will need a little extra incentive to write up a protocol paper, but they can be very useful to have. CSH Protocols has been leading on many ways from their free access articles each month to, now, the use of royalties.<\/p>\n

Finding the right niche in an online\/offline world is what keeps everyone on their toes. CSH Protocols looks to be making a nice place for itself. I’d imagine there will be some other tweaks to the publishing industry before it is all said and done.<\/em>
\n<\/p>\n

Technorati Tags: Science<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Vik Nanda Royalties for journal article authors: [Via Bench Marks] I’m happy to say that this week we sent out our first round of royalty payments to authors of original articles in CSH Protocols. Because we’re doing some reprinting of material from our already-published laboratory manuals, we built in a system to pay royalties … Continue reading Royalties<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-337","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pe2yp-5r","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":190,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/05\/20\/credit-where-credit-is-due\/","url_meta":{"origin":337,"position":0},"title":"Credit where credit is due","date":"May 20, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Shereen M Who needs coauthors?: [Via Survival Blog for Scientists] Young people, in tenure track positions, feel they to have to collect as many authorships as possible. Questions like \u201cWill I be a coauthor?\u201d and demands as \u201cI have to be a coauthor\u201d are part of daily conversations in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open Access"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/05\/oil-drop.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":110,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/04\/11\/science-in-the-open\/","url_meta":{"origin":337,"position":1},"title":"Science in the open","date":"April 11, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by jeffpearce Progress toward Public Access to Science: [Via PLoS Biology: New Articles] PLoS Chairman of the Board Harold Varmus applauds the newly enacted NIH public access policy as a positive step toward ensuring greater access to and better use of the scientific literature. This very nicely discusses some of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "General"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":418,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/10\/24\/more-discussion\/","url_meta":{"origin":337,"position":2},"title":"More discussion","date":"October 24, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by dalbera Is Science Being Distorted?: [Via The Scholarly Kitchen] A recent PLoS Medicine article claims that information economics distort science. But maybe it's an obsession with journals distorting the views of the authors. [More]As I said earlier, I thought there would be some interesting discussions. I guess one way\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open Access"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/10\/communication.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":405,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/10\/14\/the-winners-curse\/","url_meta":{"origin":337,"position":3},"title":"The Winner's Curse","date":"October 14, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Snap\u00ae Current Biomedical Publication System: A Distorted View of the Reality of Scientific Data?: [Via Scholarship 2.0: An Idea Whose Time Has Come] Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science Young NS, Ioannidis JPA, Al-Ubaydli O PLoS Medicine Vol. 5, No. 10, e201 \/ October 7 2008 [doi:10.1371\/journal.pmed.0050201] Summary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open Access"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/10\/trophies.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":257,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/06\/29\/norms-are-changing\/","url_meta":{"origin":337,"position":4},"title":"Norms are changing","date":"June 29, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by TankGirlJones Column on NIH and Harvard policies: [Via Open Access News] Karla Hahn, Two new policies widen the path to balanced copyright management: Developments on author rights, C&RL News, July\/August 2008. A light bulb is going off that is casting the issue of author rights management into new relief.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "General"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":330,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/08\/19\/missing-the-point\/","url_meta":{"origin":337,"position":5},"title":"Missing the point?","date":"August 19, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by sylvar It has been about a month since Science published Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship by James Evans. I've waited some time to comment because the results were somewhat nonintuitive, leading to some deeper thinking. The results seem to indicate that greater access to online\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "General"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/08\/pendulum.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=337"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=337"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=337"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=337"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}