{"id":319,"date":"2008-08-11T11:55:35","date_gmt":"2008-08-11T18:55:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/?p=319"},"modified":"2008-08-11T11:58:45","modified_gmt":"2008-08-11T18:58:45","slug":"multi-level-experience","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/08\/11\/multi-level-experience\/","title":{"rendered":"Multi-level experience"},"content":{"rendered":"

\" by <\/em><\/span>laffy4k<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/span>
\nCameron Neylon and the full web2.0 experience<\/a>:
\n[Via OpenWetWare<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Earlier today fellow OWW blogger Cameron Neylon<\/a> gave a talk at the Institutional Web Managers Workshop in Aberdeen and did so, not only for those present at the venue, but also to anyone with internet access<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Cameron set out to stream the talk via webcast, have updates via FriendFeed and also microblogging via Twitter.<\/p>\n

The presentation was viewed by quite a few folks and many participated on FriendFeed<\/a>. Cameron even stated that he noticed 20 new followers<\/a> on his twitter account<\/a>!<\/p>\n

Giving talks can be stressful as is, so this requires some congratulating for the effort. Great work Cameron!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It is very likely that presentations in the near future will not only be in-person and streamed on the web, but also include much larger back channels using FriendFeed and Twitter. <\/p>\n

There will not only be a way to enlarge the audience, but all these conversations can be examined in order to get a much better idea of how the presentation went and what effect any new data will have on other investigations.<\/p>\n

Presentations will not simply be monologs anymore but will have be just a part of the overall conversation. This means scientific information travels farther, faster, with greater vetting by peers than ever before.
\n<\/em>
\n<\/p>\n

Technorati Tags: Education<\/a>, Social media<\/a>, Technology<\/a>, Web 2.0<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by laffy4k Cameron Neylon and the full web2.0 experience: [Via OpenWetWare] Earlier today fellow OWW blogger Cameron Neylon gave a talk at the Institutional Web Managers Workshop in Aberdeen and did so, not only for those present at the venue, but also to anyone with internet access. Cameron set out to stream the talk via … Continue reading Multi-level experience<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[3,4],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pe2yp-59","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":308,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/08\/04\/digital-notebooks\/","url_meta":{"origin":319,"position":0},"title":"Digital notebooks","date":"August 4, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Marcin Wichary Electronic notebooks are cool, and so is RDF: [Via business|bytes|genes|molecules] Had a conversation earlier today, all about RDF and linked data. I am a big believer, which is why posts like this one by Cameron Neylon on A new way of looking at science? bring a smile.Andrew\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Knowledge Creation"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/08\/notebook.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":624,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2010\/02\/20\/an-interesting-juxtaposition\/","url_meta":{"origin":319,"position":1},"title":"An interesting juxtaposition","date":"February 20, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"by blprnt_van Reaching Agreement On The Public Domain For Science [Via Common Knowledge] Photo outside the Panton Arms pub in Cambridge, UK, licensed to the public under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike by jwyg (Jonathan Gray). Today marked the public announcement of a set of principles on how to treat data, from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Science"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/amanwithaphd.files.wordpress.com\/2010\/02\/201002201256.jpg?w=350&h=200&crop=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":254,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/06\/27\/life-scientists-at-friendfeed\/","url_meta":{"origin":319,"position":2},"title":"Life scientists at Friendfeed","date":"June 27, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"Life Sciences likes this: Friendfeed: [Via OpenWetWare] I'm going to assume that only those currently using FriendFeed will understand the self reference in the title but if you didn't that's OK. Just keep on reading, you'll get it, eventually. If you happen to be interested or work in the life\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Knowledge Creation"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":138,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/04\/23\/web-20-expo-keynote-oreilly-talk\/","url_meta":{"origin":319,"position":3},"title":"Web 2.0 expo Keynote - O'Reilly talk","date":"April 23, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by takeshi enterprise wants in to Web 2.0 heart of it is collective intelligence, it is about using data to provide services. PageRank begining of web 2.0. people vote by links. wesabe - how people spend their money is a vote. can mine in waays that banks will not. let\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Web 2.0"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/04\/oreilly.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":89,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/04\/05\/discussing-science-20\/","url_meta":{"origin":319,"position":4},"title":"Discussing Science 2.0","date":"April 5, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by geishaboy500 Web 2.0 for Biologists-Are any of the current tools worth using?: [Via Bench Marks] David Crotty has been leading a discussion regarding the acceptance of Science 2.0 by scientists. Or rather the non-acceptance. It is ironic to use Web 2.0 approaches to examine why scientists do not use\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Science"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/04\/tools.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":51,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/03\/14\/bumps-in-the-road-to-science-20\/","url_meta":{"origin":319,"position":5},"title":"Bumps in the road to Science 2.0","date":"March 14, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by Hamed Saber Why Web 2.0 is failing in Biology [Via Bench Marks] Last week I gave a talk at the American Association of Publishers Professional and Scholarly Publishing (AAP\/PSP) meeting in Washington, DC. I was part of a panel discussion on \u201cInnovative and Evolving Websites in STM Publishing\u201d along\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Web 2.0"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=319"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}