{"id":183,"date":"2008-05-17T07:28:17","date_gmt":"2008-05-17T15:28:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/?p=183"},"modified":"2008-05-17T08:28:28","modified_gmt":"2008-05-17T16:28:28","slug":"square-one-the-knowing-doing-gap","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/05\/17\/square-one-the-knowing-doing-gap\/","title":{"rendered":"Square One: The Knowing Doing Gap"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"tunnel\" by <\/em><\/span>ThunderChild the Magnificent<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/span>
\nSquare One: The Knowing Doing Gap<\/a>:
\n[Via Creativity Central<\/a>]<\/p>\n

Let’s go back 1999. Crown Prince Abdullah becomes the ruler of Jordan on the death of his father, King Hussein. Lance Armstrong wins first Tour de France. And most importantly Family Guy airs its pilot episode.<\/p>\n

It’s also the year that Jeffrey Pfeffer and Robert Sutton wrote The Knowing-Doing Gap.<\/em> Nearly a decade later a significant number of companies have amnesia. A lot of mangers read the book. A lot of managers ignored what they learned.<\/p>\n

Their preface does a masterful job of setting up the premise. “We wrote this book because we wanted to understand why so many managers know so much about organizational performance, say so many smart things about how to achieve performance, and work so hard, yet are trapped in firms that do so many things they know will undermine performance.”<\/p>\n

In a nutshell: There are more and more books and articles, more training programs and seminars and more knowledge that, although valid, often had little or no impact on what managers actually did.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nothing has really changed.<\/p>\n

[More<\/a>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In my rubric, knowledge allows decisions to be made and actions to be taken. Data interacts with humans to gain context and become information. Information interacts with human social networks to become knowledge. While knowledge allows decisions to be made, widsom permits the correct decision to be made.<\/em><\/p>\n

Knowledge, by itself, does not guarantee that the decision will be the correct one. It does permit a decision to be made, even if the decision is to collect more data. Wisdom often requires several false starts to be taken before the right path can be found. In many settings, groups actually learn more from their mistakes than from a success.
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

P.S.<\/span><\/p>\n

If you want to dig a little deeper, here are a few lines in an interview that Pheffer did with Fast Company<\/p>\n

“If companies genuinely want to move from knowing to doing, they need to build a forgiveness framework — a tolerance for error and failure — into their culture. A company that wants you to come up with a smart idea, implement that idea quickly, and learn in the process has to be willing to cut you some slack. You need to be able to try things, even if you think that you might fail.<\/p>\n

The absolute opposite mind-set is one that appears to be enjoying a lot of favor at the moment: the notion that we have to hold people accountable for their performance. Companies today are holding their employees accountable — not only for trying and learning new things, but also for the results of their actions. If you want to see how that mind-set affects performance, compare the ways that American Airlines and Southwest Airlines approach accountability — and then compare those two airlines’ performances.<\/p>\n

American Airlines has decided to emphasize accountability, right down to the departmental — and even the individual — level. If a plane is late, American wants to know whose fault it is. So if a plane is late, what do American employees do? They spend all of their time making sure that they don’t get blamed for it. And while everyone is busy covering up, no one is thinking about the customer.<\/p>\n

Southwest Airlines has a system for covering late arrivals: It’s called “team delay.” Southwest doesn’t worry too much about accountability; it isn’t interested in pinning blame. The company is interested only in getting the plane in the air and in learning how to prevent delays from happening in the future.<\/p>\n

Now ask yourself this: If you’re going to be held accountable for every mistake that you make, how many chances are you going to take? How eager are you going to be to convert your ideas into actions?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

So the final point from Square One is that a learning culture driven by creativity and innovation must allow mistakes to be made. The goal of mistakes is to learn from them, not to assign blame. People must be recognized for the attempt, not always for the solution.<\/em><\/p>\n

One of the strong points of Web 2.0 tools is that they create much more openness and transparency. This makes it much easier to tell identify someone who pushes the envelope in order to help create knowledge that is useful to the organization. If the only way to succeed is never to fail, then the organization will eventually find itself with only followers and no leaders in creativity.
\n<\/em>
\n<\/p>\n

Technorati Tags: Knowledge Creation<\/a>, Social media<\/a>, Web 2.0<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by ThunderChild the Magnificent Square One: The Knowing Doing Gap: [Via Creativity Central] Let’s go back 1999. Crown Prince Abdullah becomes the ruler of Jordan on the death of his father, King Hussein. Lance Armstrong wins first Tour de France. And most importantly Family Guy airs its pilot episode. It’s also the year that Jeffrey … Continue reading Square One: The Knowing Doing Gap<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[10,3,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-183","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-knowledge-creation","category-science","category-web-20"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pe2yp-2X","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":932,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2013\/06\/04\/big-data-is-still-just-data\/","url_meta":{"origin":183,"position":0},"title":"Big data is still just data","date":"June 4, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0by\u00a0BBVAtech Big data vs. big reality[Via O'Reilly Radar] This post originally appeared on Cumulus Partners. It\u2019s republished with permission. Quentin Hardy\u2019s recent post in the Bits blog of The New York Times touched on the gap between representation and reality that is a core element of practically every human enterprise.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cargo Cult Worlds"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":161,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/05\/09\/spanning-the-chasm\/","url_meta":{"origin":183,"position":1},"title":"Spanning the Chasm","date":"May 9, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by soylentgreen23 Is There Still A Chasm?: [Via SmoothSpan Blog] An interesting post by Leigh has popped up on Techmeme. She wonders, as I have, whether the fundamental notion of Moore\u2019s Chasm has changed. Leigh\u2019s question is whether the generation that grew up on Technology still even thinks of it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Open Access"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":390,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/09\/30\/a-generational-war\/","url_meta":{"origin":183,"position":2},"title":"A generational war","date":"September 30, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"by kentbye Social Media vs. Knowledge Management: A Generational War: [Via Enterprise 2.0 Blog] You\u2019d think Knowledge Management (KM), that venerable IT-based social engineering discipline which came up with evocative phrases like \u201ccommunity of practice,\u201d \u201cexpertise locater,\u201d and \u201cknowledge capture,\u201d would be in the vanguard of the 2.0 revolution. You\u2019d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Science"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/09\/1288-1215052987-96482b2f3b1.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":21,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/03\/03\/gsp-panel-of-widgets\/","url_meta":{"origin":183,"position":3},"title":"GSP - panel of widgets","date":"March 3, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"Widget Strategies & Social Platforms Jeremiah Owyang (Forrester Research), Hooman Radfar (Clearspring Technologies, Inc.), Walker Fenton(NewsGator), Pam Webber (Widgetbox), Ben Pashman (Gigya) Jeremiah - moderator. 2\/3 of online teens visit social networking sites daily. only 8% use them daily. what do they do? see frends are up to; send messages;\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Web 2.0"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":555,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2009\/06\/16\/communicating-science\/","url_meta":{"origin":183,"position":4},"title":"Communicating science","date":"June 16, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"by hiddedevries A Climate (Communication) Crisis?: [Via Dot Earth] If experts change how they describe global warming, will people wake up? [More] Interesting points but trying to be more emotional and dramatic is not very effective when facts are trying to be exchanged. There has been a lot of research\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Knowledge Creation"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/microphone.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":38,"url":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/2008\/03\/07\/diy-it\/","url_meta":{"origin":183,"position":5},"title":"DIY IT?","date":"March 7, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cfun, easy-to-use, collaborative applications\u201d \u2026in the workplace?: Sarah Perez has written an excellent piece on the new trend of Technology Populism - where \u201cmore and more people are functioning as their own IT department at work.\u201d More than anything, IT Managers need to realize that the power of individuals to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "General"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=183"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=183"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spreadingscience.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}